VE
Vitesse Energy, Inc. (VTS)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 delivered strong sequential growth with production up 27% q/q to 18,950 Boe/d and Adjusted EBITDA rising to $61.1M; results were supported by a $24M legal settlement and expanded hedging, while 2025 guidance was reaffirmed at 15–17k Boe/d and $80–$110M capex .
- GAAP revenue was $81.8M; including realized hedge gains, “revenue incl. hedges” was ~$87.0M; GAAP diluted EPS was $0.60. Versus S&P Global consensus, VTS posted broad beats on revenue and EPS in Q2 (see Estimates Context) .
- Management resolved a multi-year dispute with a key operator, received $24M cash, moved to take virtually all gas in kind, and executed long-term gas gathering/processing agreements—improving forward realizations and reducing G&A run-rate noise from legal expenses .
- Catalysts: execution on accretive acquisitions (near-term development and larger “chunkier” non-op assets), visibility on H2 activity/curtailments, and hedging support for the dividend maintained at $0.5625 per quarter ($2.25 annualized) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Production increased 27% q/q to 18,950 Boe/d, driven by the full integration of the Lucero assets and organic activity; oil mix was 65% .
- Legal dispute resolved: $24M cash payment recorded, gas taken in kind, and long-term agreements signed—management cited ~$2.5–3.0M run-rate improvement vs historical basis in H1 as a guidepost; “we successfully settled a multiyear lawsuit…entered long term gas gathering, processing and marketing agreements” .
- Enhanced hedge book: ~71% of remaining 2025 oil hedged at ~$69.83/bbl and ~49% of 2025 gas hedged with ~$3.73 floor collars; extended oil hedges through 2026, supporting dividend stability .
What Went Wrong
- LOE per Boe rose to $11.38 (vs $10.28 in Q1), reflecting field work and operated asset integration; management noted some LOE spend lifted Q2 volumes but intends to normalize the operated properties’ cost base .
- G&A optics noisy: reported G&A was $0.18/boe in Q2 due to offsetting previously expensed litigation costs; normalized G&A was ~$3.47/boe, with management expecting leverage to reduce G&A per Boe as scale grows .
- Guidance held steady despite a strong Q2, implying potential H2 moderation from timing/curtailments; management cited basin activity dynamics and chose not to adjust the range upward yet .
Financial Results
Income Statement and Profitability (GAAP/non-GAAP)
Notes: Q2 “revenue incl. hedges” approximates GAAP revenue plus realized derivative gains ($81.755M + $5.271M ≈ $87.0M) .
Margins (computed from cited GAAP figures)
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “We fully integrated the Lucero assets, successfully settled a multi-year lawsuit … and used our free cash flow to pay down debt… we added oil hedges in 2025 and 2026 at price levels that support our dividend.”
- CEO (call): “Positioned to deliver in a subdued oil price market… operated leg provides another lever… additional hedges added… Board declared our third quarter dividend at an annual rate of $2.25 per share.”
- President: “Production averaged just under 19,000 Boe/d, up 27% from Q1… we received a one-time $24M cash payment… entered long-term processing and marketing agreements… hedged ~71% of remaining 2025 oil and ~50% gas.”
- CFO: “Adjusted EBITDA was $61.1M, adjusted net income $18.4M, GAAP net income $24.7M… debt decreased to $106M, net debt to annualized adjusted EBITDA ~0.4x… 2025 guidance unchanged.”
Q&A Highlights
- Production trajectory and guidance: Management maintained FY25 guidance despite a strong Q2, citing visibility and operator activity; low end of guidance is “minimal chance,” but curtailments and oil price declines would be needed to reach it .
- LOE and G&A run-rate: LOE up due to early operational work on Lucero assets; reported G&A benefited from legal cost offsets; normalized G&A mid-$3/boe with expectation to decline as scale grows .
- Gas in-kind and GPM: Bespoke agreements expected to improve realizations; guidepost suggests ~$2.5–3.0M improvement for H1 indicative of forward run-rate benefits .
- Acquisitions: “Most deal flow ever” in larger assets; high return hurdles, dividend-accretive filter; cautious optimism for H2 .
- Basin dynamics: Encouraged by Chevron/Hess implications and continued Bakken efficiency improvements (longer laterals, refracs) while acknowledging episodic operator curtailments .
Estimates Context
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Observations:
- Q2 2025 beats: Revenue actual $75.6M vs $70.7M consensus; Primary EPS actual $0.4496 vs $0.2233 consensus; EBITDA actual $71.7M vs $41.5M consensus. Note: Company-reported GAAP revenue is $81.8M and Adjusted EBITDA $61.1M due to presentation differences (e.g., realized hedges and settlement accounting) .
- Forward: S&P consensus for Q3 2025 EPS ~$0.08 and revenue ~$65.7M; Q4 2025 EPS ~$0.095 and revenue ~$67.1M—implying moderation post Q2’s outsized items and activity timing.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Q2 was a strong quarter with significant beats vs consensus, aided by settlement proceeds, improved hedging, and Lucero integration; normalized G&A and LOE should improve as integration and field work concludes .
- The legal settlement and gas-in-kind shift should structurally improve gas realizations and reduce future G&A noise; management provided a ~$2.5–3.0M run-rate improvement guidepost for H1 .
- Guidance reaffirmed despite strong Q2, signaling prudence amid operator curtailments and basin timing; watch H2 volumes vs AFE trends and oil price trajectory for potential guidance updates .
- Balance sheet strengthened: net debt fell to ~$104M; net debt/annualized adj. EBITDA is ~0.43x, giving ample flexibility to pursue accretive non-op deals under strict return hurdles .
- Hedging is a key pillar supporting the $2.25 annual dividend; ~71% of remaining 2025 oil and ~49% gas hedged, with meaningful 2026 coverage added .
- Watch acquisition cadence: management sees unprecedented larger-deal flow but will remain selective; a dividend-accretive transaction is a potential upside catalyst .
- Trading implications: near term, the settlement-driven beat and improved hedge profile are positive; medium term, execution on acquisitions and stabilization of LOE/G&A will drive re-rating, while H2 volumes and macro oil prices are key swing factors .